Girls as young as 11 will be eligible for puberty blockers under the restarted Pathways trial after the MHRA agreed new protocols despite an outcry and indications it could have been limited to 14-plus. The Telegraph has the story.
Regulators halted the controversial Pathways experiment that will investigate drugs which delay the onset of puberty in children in February amid growing concerns.
But on Friday the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) said it had agreed new protocols for the trial to go ahead.
Girls will need to be at least 11 to enrol, and boys will have to be at least 12 to be put on puberty blockers.
When the trial was paused earlier this year, the MHRA said that it wanted to discuss introducing a minimum age of 14 for participants.
The letter said “potentially significant and, as yet, unquantified risk of long-term biological harms is present to participants”.
Legal action is ongoing against the Government following politicians and public figures, including Harry Potter author J.K. Rowling, expressing their opposition to the trial.
Worth reading in full.
Discussion
Comments
10 Comments
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
Satanic abuse masquerading as care.
Satanic. Plain and simple. Nay, it’s beyond evil.
Do we know how many muslim children (boys or girls) have undergone transition over the last ten years? Or is transition a White Privilege?
Brave new world, just introduce foetal alcohol next to create the tier system
When do medical procedures masquerading as ‘care’ translate into medical experimentation on humans? This is no different from Mengele’s experiments on human subjects during the 2nd world war. By what code of morality are these people living under? Weren’t the Nuremberg trials supposed to outlaw experimentation on humans? Medical ethics have been totally abandoned.
Chemical mutilation. The work of the Devil.
Androgyny is central to all satanic and occult practices. These twisted minds need to be kept well away from society’s innocent children. Since when did the MHRA have the legal right to authorise child mutilation? It has offered its opinion, nothing more, and no right-thinking person should act on it.
I am completely confused.
11 year olds mature enough to make decisions that change their bodies for life…
Below 16 not mature enough to navigate social media….
16 year old mature enough to vote…
Between 16-18 not mature enough to curtail online time so need a curfew….
Parents not mature enough to guide their children….
The State mature enough to guide your children…
What could possibly go wrong…
‘Trial, experiment, drugs, children’. What kind of a World are we living in?
On a lighter note, seen scrawled in biro on the wall a public loo over 40 years ago:
‘My mum made me a homosexual’.
Underneath in different handwriting: ‘If I buy her the wool, will she make me one’?
Mr Burnham should be asked ASAP if he supports this Evil Labour Party Policy. (Always refer to it as ‘Evil’). If he does, then he should resign as an MP immediately. If he does not then he must denounce it and campaign loudly against it.