Political Betting is a weekly column by Mark Littlewood aimed at people who like gambling on politics.
What happens to Reform if, for one reason or another, Nigel Farage exits stage right. To be clear, I don’t think this is a likely eventuality. By far the more plausible scenario is that Farage leads Reform at the next election. The prospects of him winning that election outright may be a bit lower than they were a year ago, but they are reasonable. There are also a wide range of outcomes which, whilst short of forming a majority government, are surely attractive to him (part of a coalition government perhaps or even leader of the official opposition).
Having spent several decades wielding great influence from the sidelines, it would seem a little odd for Farage to fold his hand when there’s a very reasonable chance that just another year, two or three of campaigning could lead to something approaching cold, hard power.
And yet, and yet, some are now speculating that he might opt for a different life: that he sees his role as moving mountains rather than climbing to the summit of them. He is clearly not enjoying the continued scrutiny surrounding his personal finances. (From what I’ve seen, he’s done nothing wrong, but that’s not really the point – the issue is whether he is simply finding the whole thing too tiresome.) He’s now a well-off man. But he could earn a lot more money for a lot less stress and probably have a lot more fun doing something else. The thought must at least have crossed his mind on occasion.
There’s also the chance that he is knocked off the field of play by ‘process’. He is almost certain to win back his seat of Clacton on August 13th. But might he face a second by-election as early as this autumn? That’s certainly what the vast majority of MPs and – one presumes – the bulk of those who sit on the Standards Committee will be hoping for. What collusion might then occur amongst the other parties to try and unseat him in a rerun? Who knows how the cards might fall if the voters of Clacton are sent to the polls twice in a matter of months?
All of this is to say that it’s not unreasonable to speculate on who might succeed Farage as Reform leader. It might well not happen for many years, but you can squint and see the circumstances in which it could happen rather earlier.
The bookies currently make Robert Jenrick and Zia Yusuf around about joint favourites at about 3/1 (with Jenrick possibly just a whisker ahead). Then comes Richard Tice generally available at 5/1 and a chasing pack of Suella Braverman, Danny Kruger, Laila Cunningham, Matt Goodwin and Lee Anderson all somewhere in the range of 7/1 to 25/1.
To describe the market as illiquid is an understatement. Someone called Sienna Churcher is available at some bookies at odds of between 10/1 and 16/1. I’m sure Sienna is a delightful and intelligent person but I confess I had not heard of her. A quick Google search establishes that she is a young Reform activist in local government.
If for japes and banter you want to go and put £100 or so on yourself to be the next leader of Reform, you’ll likely see your odds rapidly slashed to somewhere around Sienna Churcher’s sort of range.
In markets such as these, it’s extremely difficult to find value. However, for several reasons, I think the 5/1 on Tice is really rather tempting.
First, he is the most obvious unity candidate. In circumstances in which Nigel Farage decides to step back (or is forced to), the party is likely to experience a trauma that will demand a coming together. Most people think Zia Yusuf is the party’s most accomplished media performer after Farage, but his very direct and no-nonsense style might not be to everyone’s taste in the event that there is an unpredicted vacancy and bringing the party together is the prime objective. Having had the experience of manfully keeping the seat warm while Farage took his time over whether to re-enter frontline politics, Tice would be the obvious choice.
Second, those with fairly recent and senior Conservative antecedents are likely to find they struggle for support amongst party members who already fear being categorised as Tories 2.0. This isn’t an insuperable hurdle but I have no doubt it is a serious one. The double whammy might be that those people in Reform who are open to a possible working relationship of some sort with the Conservatives (should future circumstances demand such a thing) might also conclude that those who have recently switched sides are the least likely to be able to build such bridges. Both the purists and the peacemakers would likely lean against an immediate ex-Tory leading the party.
Third, Tice has shown a willingness to put in the hard yards in what may have appeared impossible circumstances at the time. I’m not suggesting any of the senior people in Reform are bandwagon jumpers, but we know for certain that Richard Tice has shown a willingness and ability to lead the party in tough times rather than merely joining it in good ones.
My expectation is that Farage will lead Reform into the next election (without any sort of break) but obviously at some point the party will have a new leader. The problem is that you might be holding onto your betting slip for a decade. You would also need to check the precise terms of the bet (most bets for party leaders are for the next ‘permanent’ leader and there might be all sort of subjective interpretations about where the line between permanent and temporary really sits).
I’m keeping an eye on the betting exchanges (unlike with regular bookmakers, you can cash out your bet at any time) which are currently listing Tice as about 10/3 rather than the 5/1 available on the high street. If the exchanges begin to show his odds beginning to align with the mainstream bookmakers’ average, I’d find this a very solid (and easily tradeable) bet.
Mark Littlewood is a former director of the Institute of Economic Affairs and the Director of PopCon.



Discussion
Comments
16 Comments
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
If one of those Conservative sloppy seconds were to become head of Reform, they might as well kiss the whole thing good bye.
Could he not still be Leader if he were no longer an MP?
They are assembling a strong team and taking the fight out to the Uniparties which has started the present campaign against Farage.
O/T I think Rayner accepting the £17+ is a very poor decision and will end the Burnham honeymoon asap.
Come now, be charitable – she’s obviously a bit short of cash…
You can take the girl out of the council estate, but you’ll never take the council estate out of the girl.
That’s what I thought. It would also give him more scope to operate and could compete at the next election.
Give it time – it’s almost guaranteed that the Burnham administration will be a resounding failure.
Success would actually be against the laws of physics and economics. These green-eyed pickpockets will soon run out of our money. Let’s hope we can salvage something from the rubble.
Mark risks being associated with those who WANT Nigel removed. Commentators spend far too much time criticising, analysing and condemning Farage and Reform – we could be forgiven for thinking he was already PM.
In Clacton today the general response was very enthusiastic for Farage. A few said they did not like him personally and a couple (who turned out to be established supporters of other parties not contesting the seat) reeled of the usual Guardian line.
On the basis of doorsteps o visited he is home and dry, Mark. So try analysing that.
Try also considering the future of this country if the old political class (Uniparty and their blob enablers and media cheer leaders) succeed in using confidential information from the deep state to damage Reform. What would that say about democracy, freedom, accountability in this country.
Take care you don’t end up on the wrong side.
If Farage resigns or looses his seat before the next election hopefully the new leader can patch things up with Rupert Lowe and bring him back into Reform, possibly as deputy leader so Restore doesn’t split the patriot vote. All political parties should welcome people who have, within reason, somewhat different opinions and there doesn’t seem to be a massive difference between what Lowe says and what Reform say.
Yussuf would have to consider remaining in the party for that to happen.
I’d be happy with Jenrick, Zia or Tice, possibly in that order. It wouldn’t affect my vote one bit. They are all good, very capable people in slightly different ways and I feel sure would work together well.
No sorry Clive Jenrick is a deeply unsound opportunist.
The future Patriotic Party, also known as the Reform Party, also known as the Brexit Party, also known as the UKIP Party will never be in power and Mr Nigel Farage will never be the Prime Minister of the United Kingdom.
We knew that the day he dislodged Rice and engaged Zia and Laila instead.
Would you care to expand on your comment?
Delighted, as it gives me a chance for self-therapy.
First, a huge shout for Nigel for conning me. A totally apolitical citizen, for the first time in my life I found myself standing outside tube stations handing out first Ukip and then Brexit leaflets, thus losing many friends and relatives.
Only to discover that Nigel betrayed not just little whitebait me, but also much bigger fish in his inner circle (if you ever meet David B, Diane J, Richard B, Steven W and many more, please ask them what they think of “Nigel’s calculator”).
If you then do only a cursory search of those people who helped him with all his Parties, you will discover that Nigel has left a long queue of genuine women and men who feel betrayed by him.
Eventually, even the willfully blind will realise that Nigel is a controlled opposition to stop us moving away from the tyranny of Europe and ensure that Britain is flooded with millions of LEGAL immigrants (diverting your attention by counting dinghies in Dover).
I could go on, but do you genuine believe that Laila and Zia will stop the muslim invasion?
Best wishes to Reform.